Superfluities Redux

On culture and theatre, by George Hunka

A new journal for theatre minima and organum posts exclusively can now be found here.

Thursday, 29 May 2008

Chris Shinn on Bill Henson, Agency, Sexuality and Power

NOTE: I should point out here that my posting of Chris's comments below shouldn't be taken to indicate my agreement or disagreement with any of his opinions (as if this matter is reducible to black-and-white considerations of right and wrong). In particular, I would suggest that Chris's idea that "society must keep in place a taboo against incest and adult-child sexual contact" should not be construed to be an approval of a taboo against photographic or other representations of adolescent sexuality (lest we bar teenaged Juliets from the stage); certainly it shouldn't be used as the basis for the criminalization of certain kinds of art. Chris and Coetzee are both right when they cite these issues as "subtle" and "complex." As is, indeed, Chris's considered response.


This morning playwright Christopher Shinn posted some thoughts in the comments section to my original post on Bill Henson. In the interests of maintaining a broader, open discussion on these issues – which will, I'm sure, arise again – I reprint them below, with his kind permission:

"It's actually very dangerous to decide whether these photographs are acceptable or not by interviewing the subjects of the photographs, for any number of reasons. Anna Freud showed us that people who are abused often exhibit 'identification with the aggressor' as a defense against trauma. So a former subject claiming the photographs did no harm should not be used to exonerate the photographer, as this may be an ego defense against indescribable and even unrepresentable pain.

"Conversely, a subject claiming that photographs did harm them should not be used to determine whether or not the photographer did something immoral or illegal. There are any number of reasons that a person who has suffered trauma elsewhere might displace the blame for this trauma onto a less fraught person than a primary object (like a parent). Scapegoating is all too common, as I think George's comments imply – child sexual abuse did not begin with photography and will not end with the prosecution and persecution of Bill Henson.

"I think this issue forces us to think abstractly and philosophically as well as scientifically (keeping in mind that science is ideological as well) about incredibly 'subtle' and 'complex' issues (as Coetzee calls them in one of the links above).

"I am deeply moved by JFK's testimony [in the comments section of this post] because of the larger and deeper issues of agency, autonomy, power, and submission in human life that it makes me think about. Because I agree with Freud that infantile and childhood sexuality are universal and foundational, and that therefore society must keep in place a taboo against incest and adult-child sexual contact, I think photographs like Henson's are profoundly troubling. I thank God I'm not a legislator in this area. I would ask anyone who was, however, to read Freud's essays on sexuality and Ferenczi's 'On the confusion of tongues between adults and child' as they think through these complex issues."

Posted at 12.49 pm in /Politics

Permanent link to this story


Thursday, 29 May 2008

Tristan in New York

Those who may have missed the recent Met production of Tristan und Isolde will have the opportunity to see it on television tonight, when it runs as part of PBS's Great Performances series on WNET Channel 13 at 8.00pm. Deborah Voigt and Robert Dean Smith take the title roles under the baton of James Levine in a production by Dieter Dorn. I wrote about this production earlier this year here.

Posted at 9.53 am in /Music

Permanent link to this story