Superfluities Redux

On culture and theatre, by George Hunka

A new journal for theatre minima and organum posts exclusively can now be found here.

Tuesday, 05 August 2008

Organum

Cross-posted to the theatre minima journal.


I come from a tradition of Western culture in which the ideal (my ideal) was the complex, dense and "cathedral-like" structure of the highly educated and articulate personality – a man or woman who carried inside themselves a personally constructed and unique version of the entire heritage of the West. ...

But today, I see within us all (myself included) the replacement of complex inner density with a new kind of self-evolving under the pressure of information overload and the technology of the "instantly available." A new self that needs to contain less and less of an inner repertory of dense cultural inheritance ... spread wide and thin as we connect with that vast network of information accessed by the mere touch of a button.

Richard Foreman (2005)

The conception of the individual self as a cathedral, possessed of both sacred and earthly objects, possessing its own self-constructed, deliberate but profoundly intuitive and even visionary architectonic, was Dante's achievement in the Comedy. The consciousness of the individual, and the ability to reproduce this consciousness in the work of art, emerged not from the Enlightenment but from the beginnings of the Italian Renaissance, and it's no surprise that the great Italianate architecture of the cathedrals of the era parallelled Dante's mission. But once achieved, there's no going back: whatever follows will be accompanied with an awareness of the loss of this architectonic consciousness of the self. The English Renaissance followed late; in the collected work of Shakespeare we find a greater, more Northern European conception of this self, nearly contemporaneous with the painters of the Northern Renaissance (so we talk of "Dante" or "Shakespeare" as these fictive cathedrals of their collective work, rather than the Vita Nuova or As You Like It, when coming to terms with this achievement). Like cathedrals, these selves and works contain their grand naves and mausoleums, the individual works, perhaps, their chapels.

All this under the design of a single architect, or artist: the self as the plan, the structure as its aesthetic achievement. As the body of the self contains and consists of flesh, blood, bone, the cathedral itself contains and consists of light, stone, air. And art and theatre: body, music, vision, language. (Wagner, with Bayreuth, insisted on all three structures simultaneously.) But all are consciously constructed, all consist of carefully contrived, disciplined architectonics. The great works of art are profound, massive spaces for contemplation. (For example, the extraordinary conception of The World as Will and Representation, more appealing to artists than perhaps any other philosophical work because the book itself is a grand work of art, possessed of an aesthetic four-fold architectonic and intense youthful passion – Schopenhauer was only 30 at the time of its first publication – as brilliantly lyrical and poetic as Dante's or Shakespeare's poems.) The artist's work as cathedral continues in our time as well; from Joyce (the Catholic Baroque) to Beckett (the Protestant simplicity and restraint); perhaps few others, because the creation of such cathedrals is always self-conscious and complex, and we seek simple and easily-acquired escapes from the darker corners of self in the 21st century. Similar individual works of contemporary art, like Syberberg's Hitler: A Film from Germany, are endlessly fascinating, like the most labyrinthine cathedrals.

What we shall have otherwise are minor structures that turn the soul to the contemplation of the simple ground, rather than the vast darkness that spreads above. The construction and the experience of a cathedral require more than a lifetime. Our damnation, and our hope, is that a cathedral is never finished.

Posted at 9.38 am in /Organum

Permanent link to this story