Superfluities Redux

by George Hunka
Artistic director, theatre minima

A Theatre Surrounds a City:
Vienna's Burgtheater


Tuesday, 03 February 2009

Archives: The Writer's Body as an Instrument of Investigation

From the Organum; originally posted 2 October 2006; lightly revised.


Ain't Got No Body. The dramatist is invisible after the theatrical text is created and passed along to the performer for expression, which begs the question: If the dramatist is not expressing during the performative instant, if her work is perceived to have been finished months or years before, what is she doing there? Why there at all, especially in the transgressive performance styles of Antonin Artaud and Reza Abdoh? As profoundly physical as the act of physical performance is, the psychic investigation of the writer requires that she use her body as an open conduit for the perception, investigation, and description of the unconscious Schopenhauerian Will that runs through it. The performer expresses; the dramatist reads impressions of Representations on her body and describes (and inscribes into a hopelessly inadequate language) the linguistic scrapes and leavings of that Will. The dramatist answers the question that is directed to her ("Why your text at all?") with this response: "I leave my markings with what the long culture and history of writing has given to me, adding my own scratchmarks to go a little further along the road to destruction and light: the Will offers both." To be fully open and aware of the Will's operation the writer's body needs to be as trained and supple, as well-equipped for physical observation as the performer's is well-equipped for physical expression, this training a cleansing of the skin's lenses. The avenues towards transcendence are often those which are most obscured by sloppiness, waste, laziness, carelessness, trivia, and garbage. To the noisy representation, oppose the more precise eye; to the language's inadequacy before the experience, oppose the more carefully considered word. Every word, from noun and verb to preposition and article, carries with it its own theoretical antonym. The dramatist works against this inherent irony and self-contradiction of language. She keeps trying to express lucidly, without irony. To do so she needs the lucid, limpid eye to still her inscribing, shaking, imperfect hand. Which nonetheless, as physiological expression of the Will, is always working against itself. The dramatist writes herself out of her expression and disappears into the performer's body and voice. Nonetheless, a bodied presence herself in those words, though invisible, requiring a continuing effort at physical perfection of the perceiving instrument, the writer's body (always aging, always decaying, always at the mercy of the amoral microbe that offers dis-ease).

Posted in /Archives

Permanent link to this story