Superfluities Redux

by George Hunka
Artistic director, theatre minima

A Theatre Surrounds a City:
Vienna's Burgtheater


Tuesday, 20 October 2009

21 for 21

In just a few hours here in New York, midnight marks the commencement of the 21 for 21 project: Actors over four continents and eighteen countries will be performing the work of Howard Barker in celebration of the 21st birthday of The Wrestling School, a company dedicated to the performance of his work. Through the 24 hours of 21 October 2009, from time zone to time zone, Israel to Australia, performances of Barker's plays, as well as performances devised from his theory and poetry, will spread around the world with the turning of the planet.

The Wrestling School's own main 21 for 21 offering, Found in the Ground, closed on 11 October (I reviewed the production here). However, Gerrard McArthur (Toonelhuis in Found in the Ground) will direct a staged reading of Barker's recent Hurts Given and Received with members of the Wrestling School tomorrow at 8.45pm at the Gielgud Studio at RADA, Malet Street in London (admission free). The other main English event tomorrow night will be the Theatre Royal's The Castle, to be performed by current members of the Royal Shakespeare Company ensemble, marking a return of Barker's work to the RSC stage. Finally, in Aberystwyth, Wales, David Ian Rabey directs a new production of Barker's A Wounded Knife, which also opens tomorrow at 7.45pm and runs through Saturday. This doesn't complete the list of productions at all, even for London; a full schedule is here.

Here in New York, two 21 for 21 events are scheduled for the near future: The Barker Project's reading of Pity in History at the Drama Book Shop on 23 October (details here and in this recent Playbill article), and Judith from the Potomac Theatre Company on 26 October (details here).

Howard Barker's work has seemed to appeal to a coterie audience, but as this effort demonstrates, that coterie (larger, it appears, than what one might be led to believe) is devoted to Barker's uncompromising vision of theatre and its transformational potentials, and so may have influence and significance far beyond mere numbers. It is impossible to think of a similar global event devoted to a contemporary living dramatist and director. Barker seems constitutionally incapable of compromise in his work and career: absolutely unique, he attracts the passion, dedication and discipline of theatre artists who, instead of being disciples, are through his work released into the freedom of their own imaginative, moral and erotic possibilities. They recognize that Barker's words discover something absolutely unique in themselves, and having experienced that freedom continue to seek it out, over and over again: a freedom won from the exploration of the body's ecstasy and the consciousness of its decay, a freedom sparked by his words but completed only in their own experience. So tragic, but far from pessimistic (or for that matter optimistic), and possessed of a genuine hope: a hope that remains alive not in compromise (which characterizes so much contemporary theatre, in which writers, directors, designers and audiences compromise themselves, their politics and culture, their work and the form itself) but in the pursuit of the realized, disciplined, uncompromised experience. It requires courage and attracts silence, willful ignorance, hostility, dismay, contempt and even ridicule. From all, that is, but those who know.

So much Barker, so little time. Congratulations are due to Sarah Goldingay, the executive producer of the event, who deserves the full credit for its conception. She says, "Howard has been writing plays since the 1970s. I first came across his work when I was a student; I was mesmerized by his dark and erotic stories and poetic language. The 21st anniversary of the Wrestling School Theatre Company gives us a great reason to revisit his rich body of work, old and new. His plays seem even more relevant now in a world that is trying to understand the wars it is fighting and economic turmoil it is in. Everyone involved in the project is giving their time for free."

To recognize the participants in 21 for 21, Barker provided the following text, addressed to the companies, performers and audiences who will join together for the celebration:

We were outside, always outside, like heretics or lepers forbidden to pass the city gates.

Then one night, by agreement, we lit fires at the same hour, and the extent of the light showed us we were not alone, as we had thought, but we were numerous, and not only numerous, but inspired, and could both move and speak in the light, and be beautiful...

H.B.
21 — X — 09

Posted in /Dramatists/Howard_Barker
Permanent link to this story


Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Word of the day

In today's Guardian, Michael Billington offers an apologia for his use of the epithet "Brechtian" in describing a new London revival of Annie Get Your Gun:

"Brechtian" these days has come to mean "slow, ponderous, didactic" ...

Intriguingly, Deborah Warner's current Mother Courage at the National is the very opposite of what we normally mean by "Brechtian": it's light, nimble-footed with a piratical performance from Fiona Shaw and a Duke Special score in which Weimar meets soft rock. But Brecht himself is partly to blame for the way he is often done: he left behind a mountain of "model-books" about his productions which, slavishly followed, lead to leaden revivals. Throw away the rule-books and the plays live again.

And, although Brecht himself once said his work's future depended on communism's survival, I suspect he's due for re-appraisal. With capitalism going through one of its cyclical crises, his plays have acquired renewed topicality.

Billington blames Brecht ("partly") for the often sluggish productions that Brecht may receive in London, but of course, partly Brecht is not to blame. Among Brecht's very last writings was a note to his Berliner Ensemble company on the eve of their first trip to London (with, speaking of irony, Mother Courage), encouraging the players to make their playing "quick, light, and strong," a result, he said, of "quick thinking." While it's true that those modelbooks may have resulted in moth-eaten, languorous productions for which the Berliner Ensemble was notorious in the 1960s and 1970s (and even Brecht scholar John Willett has left highly critical notes on Brecht's own productions in his excellent book Brecht in Context), one can't blame Brecht for Elisabeth Hauptmann or Helene Weigel's dismissal of Brecht's own advice.

Though here in the U.S. (as, apparently, in England) it's Mother Courage that gets on the boards most often, the re-appraisal is already underway, and intriguingly it's the earlier, more politically astute work into which new life is being poured. In the past few seasons, New York has seen an imaginative revival of the 1926 Man Is Man and a fine, rare staging of the 1932 St. Joan of the Stockyards. Productions by small companies, working in studios and basements instead of the mainstages of institutional theatres, but imaginative and fine nonetheless. One day American artistic directors may discover that Brecht's work consists of far more than Mother Courage and The Threepenny Opera; it would be to their, and our, advantage to re-examine a dramatist who in many ways was the 20th century Shakespeare.

Posted in /Dramatists/Bertolt_Brecht
Permanent link to this story