Superfluities Redux

by George Hunka
Artistic director, theatre minima

A Theatre Surrounds a City:
Vienna's Burgtheater


Tuesday, 23 March 2010

A Critique of Tragedy 13

If I had known about the Frankfurt School in time, I would have been saved a great deal of work. I would not have said a certain amount of nonsense and would not have taken so many false trails trying not to get lost, when the Frankfurt School had already cleared the way.

Michel Foucault, 1983
Quoted in Rolf Wiggershaus
The Frankfurt School:
Its History, Theories and Political Significance
(p 4)

The idea that an acknowledged metaphysics underlying a drama necessarily leads to a thesis play, an intellectualized representation of experience, is easily dismissed: the Greek tragedians worked during the era of the pre-Socratic philosophers, and though they share a deep-rooted commonality of perspective, the dramas they produced have endured not because of their intellectual but because of their broadly human content. This philosophy was the ground in which the aesthetic work took root and flourished. As the quote above suggests, the work of Critical Theory, that of Adorno, Horkheimer and so many others, seems to have been the most significant of the twentieth century, presaging both the postmodernists and the structuralists: certainly its nearly century-old status as a central body of thought for twentieth-century experience must be reckoned with. It demands a claim on our attention. The project of a revival of tragedy in its philosophical light is a life-long project. But for that reason it is essential, and we should be cheered by the prospects it offers for knowledge through our lives, and not downcast by the impossibility of the project's completion.

Between the political materialism of Marx (and its optimism for progressive improvement of the race) and the psychological darkness of Freud (and its pessimism for the ability of the human individual to finally adjust to the tragedy of experience), and therefore between their forebears Hegel and Schopenhauer: this is a dynamic in which the dramatic work operates not as the statement of a problem but as the exploration of bodied consciousness, both a historic construct and a metaphysical condition. It should come as no surprise that aesthetics is central to the project of Critical Theory, as it was to Schopenhauer's metaphysics: each informs the other, and any reconciliation between the two appears impossible. But again, this is not a problem, but a condition, perhaps the condition of the race, and it is informed too by the bloody history of the twentieth century, perhaps the bloodiest of histories. As the Greeks knew, it was the dramatic stage upon which the philosophical dynamic plays itself out, the speaking human body the fleshed dynamic: but offering in the end not a dead conclusion, but an organic experience; the start of a new road into the unknown, into the dark, and possibility.

It is difficult not to acknowledge the difficulty of the task, and the responsibility of the dramatist and performer towards not only history (the history of the form as well as the history of the race) but also the autonomous self within it ... it is dangerous, thankless work ... but why else write or stage a play at all ...


Other "Critique of Tragedy" posts here.

Posted in /Tragedy
Permanent link to this story