Superfluities Redux

by George Hunka
Artistic director, theatre minima

A Theatre Surrounds a City:
Vienna's Burgtheater


Home > Dramatists > Howard_Barker

Friday, 13 November 2009

On difficulty and ideas in the theatre

A few days ago Matt Trueman's "Can theatre be too clever for its own good?" appeared at the Guardian theatre blog. As usual, the headline doesn't quite do the piece justice, but Matt discusses "how much theatre can expect of us, its audience" — a broad question, maybe too broad. Matt's main point is the shared cultural presumptions of an audience and a theatremaker, but perhaps the issue goes deeper:

Ought it to presume nothing and explain everything? Should it treat us like idiots by playing to the lowest common denominator? Of course not. To insist on such mollycoddling would be to outlaw anything that does more than scratch the surface. However, theatre has a responsibility to be accessible. It is, after all, as much about the communication of ideas as it is about the ideas themselves.

In which case one must ask: what about difficult or surprising ideas, ideas that undermine what the audience member may or may not bring with them into the theatre in the first place, ideas that beggar easy communication? In this case, incomprehension may lead to new insights. If the theatre is merely charged with telling us what we already know, what place imagination?

What is accessible to Matt may not be accessible to me, and vice versa, and this is dependent not only on our cultural knowledge, our schooling or our individual philosophies, our preconceptions and prejudices, but on our openness to new theatrical experience — or music, or plastic art — as well. Asking artists to cater to both of us, as he points out, cripples the artist. But this is the fallacy in considering an audience as one large mass rather than a collection of individuals.

To answer the post's question with a simple uncomplicated "yes" is to guarantee a simple uncomplicated theatre that tells audience members what they already know, and this is not what we ask of art. Howard Barker's response in the poem below is "no" — and not a simple, uncomplicated no, and it has to do with more than mere cleverness. The poem is the first prologue to The Bite of the Night, and though I believe I've posted it before, it's worth remembering:

They brought a woman from the street
And made her sit in the stalls
By threats
By bribes
By flattery
Obliging her to share a little of her life with actors

But I don't understand art

Sit still, they said

But I don't want to see sad things

Sit still, they said

And she listened to everything
Understanding some things
But not others
Laughing rarely, and always without knowing why
Sometimes suffering disgust
Sometimes thoroughly amazed
And in the light again said

If that's art I think it is hard work
It was beyond me
So much of it beyond my actual life

But something troubled her
Something gnawed her peace
And she came a second time, armoured with friends

Sit still, she said

And again, she listened to everything
This time understanding different things
This time untroubled that some things
Could not be understood
Laughing rarely but now without shame
Sometimes suffering disgust
Sometimes thoroughly amazed
And in the light again said

That is art, it is hard work

And one friend said, too hard for me
And the other said if you will
I will come again

Because I found it hard I felt honoured

Posted in /Dramatists/Howard_Barker

Permanent link to this story


Home > Dramatists > Howard_Barker

Thursday, 22 October 2009

What's not to like

UPDATE: And speaking of 21 for 21, there's this article from Dominic Cavendish in yesterday's Telegraph. Some thoughts here for those considering international collaboration, criticism and funding. As he notes, briefly: "21 for 21 — as this worldwide tribute is called — feels like a breakthrough moment in terms of the global theatre-making community's collaborative capacity — and it feels like a step in the right direction in turning a spotlight on Barker's achievements. Hats off to Sarah Goldingay, the executive director of The Wrestling School [this is an error, unfortunately: she is instead the executive producer of the 21 for 21 project], who has spearheaded this event. Rather than grand gestures in future, though, what we really need are simple, pragmatic decisions by people with access to resources."


In his post "Should we watch plays for pleasure?" in today's Guardian, Andrew Haydon, who wrote a mixed review of Howard Barker's Found in the Ground for London's Time Out, cogitates upon his critical reaction to the play:

... I was annoyed because this play wouldn't let me [have "a nice night out" at the theatre]. Or because my bourgeois notions of enjoyment and reward were unfulfilled, as Barker might have put it. Thus, in a curious way, I'm more grateful to the production than I thought. More than any other show I've seen, it has made me think about the way I experience theatre. The extent of its jarring, dissonant juxtapositions; its refusal to map on to a received world view; its complete indifference to my enjoyment; even its refusal to be part of "contemporary theatre" — all have continued to fascinate me.

The play has made me question why I want to be charmed by theatre, and told things, made to laugh, and understand; why I should feel the need to identify with characters, and why poetry should resonate for me. Why, in short, I should want theatre to function as a flattering looking glass. None of this makes me like the play any better, but it leaves me with the troubling sense that maybe it's my problem and not Barker's.

Haydon's full article is here.

Posted in /Dramatists/Howard_Barker

Permanent link to this story


Home > Dramatists > Howard_Barker

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

21 for 21

In just a few hours here in New York, midnight marks the commencement of the 21 for 21 project: Actors over four continents and eighteen countries will be performing the work of Howard Barker in celebration of the 21st birthday of The Wrestling School, a company dedicated to the performance of his work. Through the 24 hours of 21 October 2009, from time zone to time zone, Israel to Australia, performances of Barker's plays, as well as performances devised from his theory and poetry, will spread around the world with the turning of the planet.

The Wrestling School's own main 21 for 21 offering, Found in the Ground, closed on 11 October (I reviewed the production here). However, Gerrard McArthur (Toonelhuis in Found in the Ground) will direct a staged reading of Barker's recent Hurts Given and Received with members of the Wrestling School tomorrow at 8.45pm at the Gielgud Studio at RADA, Malet Street in London (admission free). The other main English event tomorrow night will be the Theatre Royal's The Castle, to be performed by current members of the Royal Shakespeare Company ensemble, marking a return of Barker's work to the RSC stage. Finally, in Aberystwyth, Wales, David Ian Rabey directs a new production of Barker's A Wounded Knife, which also opens tomorrow at 7.45pm and runs through Saturday. This doesn't complete the list of productions at all, even for London; a full schedule is here.

Here in New York, two 21 for 21 events are scheduled for the near future: The Barker Project's reading of Pity in History at the Drama Book Shop on 23 October (details here and in this recent Playbill article), and Judith from the Potomac Theatre Company on 26 October (details here).

Howard Barker's work has seemed to appeal to a coterie audience, but as this effort demonstrates, that coterie (larger, it appears, than what one might be led to believe) is devoted to Barker's uncompromising vision of theatre and its transformational potentials, and so may have influence and significance far beyond mere numbers. It is impossible to think of a similar global event devoted to a contemporary living dramatist and director. Barker seems constitutionally incapable of compromise in his work and career: absolutely unique, he attracts the passion, dedication and discipline of theatre artists who, instead of being disciples, are through his work released into the freedom of their own imaginative, moral and erotic possibilities. They recognize that Barker's words discover something absolutely unique in themselves, and having experienced that freedom continue to seek it out, over and over again: a freedom won from the exploration of the body's ecstasy and the consciousness of its decay, a freedom sparked by his words but completed only in their own experience. So tragic, but far from pessimistic (or for that matter optimistic), and possessed of a genuine hope: a hope that remains alive not in compromise (which characterizes so much contemporary theatre, in which writers, directors, designers and audiences compromise themselves, their politics and culture, their work and the form itself) but in the pursuit of the realized, disciplined, uncompromised experience. It requires courage and attracts silence, willful ignorance, hostility, dismay, contempt and even ridicule. From all, that is, but those who know.

So much Barker, so little time. Congratulations are due to Sarah Goldingay, the executive producer of the event, who deserves the full credit for its conception. She says, "Howard has been writing plays since the 1970s. I first came across his work when I was a student; I was mesmerized by his dark and erotic stories and poetic language. The 21st anniversary of the Wrestling School Theatre Company gives us a great reason to revisit his rich body of work, old and new. His plays seem even more relevant now in a world that is trying to understand the wars it is fighting and economic turmoil it is in. Everyone involved in the project is giving their time for free."

To recognize the participants in 21 for 21, Barker provided the following text, addressed to the companies, performers and audiences who will join together for the celebration:

We were outside, always outside, like heretics or lepers forbidden to pass the city gates.

Then one night, by agreement, we lit fires at the same hour, and the extent of the light showed us we were not alone, as we had thought, but we were numerous, and not only numerous, but inspired, and could both move and speak in the light, and be beautiful...

H.B.
21 — X — 09

Posted in /Dramatists/Howard_Barker

Permanent link to this story