Superfluities Redux

On culture and theatre, by George Hunka

A new journal for theatre minima and organum posts exclusively can now be found here.

Home > Publications

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

On Newsstands Now

The September 2008 issue of PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, online and on newsstands now, features my introduction to this gallery of working papers and photographs from a few of Richard Foreman's recent productions.

But the issue itself is introduced by Robert Brustein's somewhat petulant and cranky essay "More Masterpieces," in which Brustein takes to task what he calls a "radical theatre" trend to trivialise classic dramatic literature: "I am now ready to concede," says the author of The Theatre of Revolt, "that the postmodern movement may have gone too far, and that instead of helping to illuminate classical plays, the auteur director is often obfuscating and obscuring them." Brustein then discusses two recent productions, The Wooster Group's Hamlet and Ivo van Hove's The Misanthrope, and concludes that the directorial imperatives brought to these productions "do not allow us to enter the play[s]," using a first person plural in which I certainly wouldn't include myself, who happily entered into van Hove's Misanthrope in a way that I hadn't been able to enter (funny use of the word, that) a Moliere play before. But the world is a big place; to each his own.

Brustein's discussion is limited to directorial approaches to classical texts, and I do wonder what his response would have been to contemporary dramaturgical responses to classical texts, such as John Jesurun's Philoctetes or Howard Barker's (Uncle) Vanya; on these, Brustein is unfortunately silent, for his comment would be most interesting, given his dismay at what directors, let alone dramatists, have done to similarly canonical works. He is not silent, however, about his fear that these directorial approaches are "more evidence of our growing indifference to the written word," citing (once again) that Richard Nelson speech to ART/NY last year about the lack of production opportunities available to new American playwrights.

Mind you, I live in a city in which there has just concluded a massive Fringe festival: over 200 productions – not readings or workshops, but productions, however simple they were – of plays and performances of one sort or another, over ninety percent of them quite new, within a 16-day period. The upcoming season will provide hundreds more. The answer to Nelson is written on the wall: these playwrights and artists self-produce; if you're only looking to Broadway and the regional institutional theatres, of course they seem invisible. But you shouldn't hope to find cats in a doghouse. What institutional theatres perpetuate are their own salaries, processes and buildings and the ideological status quo, not the future of theatre as an art. (Advances in theatrical and dramatic form have rarely come from institutions, but more often from small theatres, from Antoine's Theatre Libre to Richard Maxwell's NYC Players, founded by directors and playwrights when the existing institutions seemed closed to their innovations.) The plays and playwrights are here, if you look for them; and so far as quality goes, not every institutional theatre or Broadway production is exactly a work of genius either (though these failures are far more expensive).

And beware, Mr. Brustein – at the end of my article, Foreman warns that one of his next productions will be a staging of a play by Federico Garcia Lorca. He doesn't plan to deconstruct then reconstruct the text as he would for one of his own plays, but "it will be my own version of Lorca," he told me. Will the horror never end?

Posted at 1.24 pm in /Publications

Permanent link to this story