Superfluities Redux

On culture and theatre, by George Hunka

A new journal for theatre minima and organum posts exclusively can now be found here.

Home > Videos

Thursday, 24 July 2008

What Would Jesus Buy?

If on its first release you missed the Morgan Spurlock-produced, Rob VanAlkemade-directed What Would Jesus Buy?, a 2007 documentary about Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping, you can now find it at better video stores everywhere (as well as through amazon.com). The film chronicles a nationwide tour that Billy, church director Savitri Durkee and the choir itself made through America the year before – a mission to inform consumers through guerilla satire about the extent to which corporate America had undermined the spiritual basis of the Christmas holiday, as well as the idea of community itself, with a new gospel of consumerism.

If you're converted, the film will preach to you already, but Spurlock and VanAlkemade have also made a concerted effort to provide some historical background on the rise of credit industry practices that still pose a profound threat to the health of American economic life (as this front-page article in last Sunday's New York Times indicates). At the center of the film however are the Rev and his choir as they invade the Mall of America and Walmart headquarters in California to bring enlightenment to Christmas shoppers. It's almost always very funny, and Billy is a potent, charismatic personality, but we also get a glimpse of a few intimate moments of private exhaustion and self-doubt, as well as a bus crash that injured several church members and had the potential to devastate the tour, before a celebratory finish at Disneyland in Anaheim on Christmas Day.

Purchase it at amazon.com today. Or, if that's a little too ironic for you, you can always add it to your Netflix queue, like I did, or borrow it from your local library. I wrote about Billy's performance at the Spiegeltent for the New York Times in 2006.

Posted at 8.33 am in /Videos

Permanent link to this story


Home > Videos

Monday, 05 May 2008

Play by Samuel Beckett

According to Ruby Cohn, Samuel Beckett's 1963, 15-minute Play was the first of his own theatre pieces that he personally directed, stepping in for the unreliable Jean-Marie Serreau to oversee rehearsals for a 1964 Paris production (French title: Comédie). As Cohn notes, it's a key dramatic text in Beckett's body of work. Abandoned now are the vaudevillian gestures of Waiting for Godot, Endgame, Krapp's Last Tape and Happy Days; for the final 25 years of his career, Beckett would work in more seemingly hermetic lyrical forms, disdaining not only vaudeville but also the gestures to conventional theatrical time. No longer was Beckett concerned with the length of his pieces (whether a play would go a full evening, or as half of an evening of one-act plays). Beckett had written to director Alan Schneider that Endgame's intended reception depended on "the power of the text to claw." Beckett increasingly saw burlesque and comedy as a manicure upon those nails, and although the later plays and prose have their comic moments, they can no longer be mistaken for poignant (not with the old woman's curse "Fuck life" in Rockaby or the unsuccessful torturers of What Where), or hysterically funny. (I wonder sometimes about this need to turn Beckett into some kind of hail-fellow-well-met who'd be delightful to share a few drinks with at a local pub, or to think that the trio of Play is some version of an existential Three Stooges, as if he never really intended the darker implications of his work. To each his own, of course, and I find the stones of Molloy's pockets and the Lynch family of Watt funny too, but not rolling-on-the-ground, screaming-with-laughter funny.) Instead, they resemble more the fictions after The Unnamable, reaching a nadir of blackness with How It Is before the gentler but still torturous remembrances of Company.

Play, as its title indicates, is ironically self-conscious as to its form (the story itself is a melodrama about adultery), and it was, to date, the most technically ambitious and demanding of Beckett's career. Anthony Minghella's film adaptation, too, is profoundly self-conscious as to its medium, and because Roy Walker's production design and Hauke Richter's art direction helpfully locate the setting in a gray expanse reminiscent of Gustave Doré's illustrations for Dante's Inferno and Purgatorio, they are justifiable if unnecessary graftings onto what is a very plain theatrical vision.

I disagree with Cohn, though, when she asserts, "For all the brilliance of performers who have to subdue their theatricality, only readers can appreciate Beckett's dramatic skill in Play. ... Play is not only to be looked at and listened to, but it is also to be read." Of course this play, as well as Not I, makes extreme demands upon both performer and audience when it comes to the communicability of the text, but this demand is a necessary and sufficient part of the theatrical experience here, however helpful a familiarity with the text might be. The demand is a component of the work's urgency. Gone are the pratfalls, falling trousers and banana peels of Beckett's middle career plays and novels. We're left now with the use of a can opener (and not the electric or rotary-style can opener either) in performance of an anal rape (How It Is) and the impulse to human expression itself as a device of torture (Not I). Semi-paralyzed bodies that do not or cannot move cannot comically fall; instead they embody souls for whom the fall into damnation is far from comic.


More on Samuel Beckett here.

Posted at 9.01 am in /Videos

Permanent link to this story


Home > Videos

Monday, 07 April 2008

Movie of the Week

Back in the day (more precisely 1976), I was led to think of the theatre as a career when I saw John Gielgud and Ralph Richardson on Broadway in Peter Hall's production of No Man's Land by Harold Pinter. That was 32 years ago now. Perhaps sentimentally I continue to think of it as one of Pinter's most meditative, elegaic plays. And you certainly can't beat that cast.

Theatre is ephemeral and over the years the memory has faded somewhat, though the power of the work continued to claw. Fortunately memory can get a poke in the side too. Below is a video of the 90-minute BBC television version of the play, recorded in 1976 with the original cast. The image and sound are a little hazy, but no more so than my memory:

Over the weekend I updated my own Web site, with new material on the biography and news pages.

Posted at 8.28 am in /Videos

Permanent link to this story


Home > Videos

Wednesday, 12 December 2007

Videos

Three short videos today, comparative rarities. First, there's this 1949 interview from American radio with the composer Arnold Schönberg, who discusses his paintings, his music and his influences:

Also on music, and as a final in memoriam for Karlheinz Stockhausen, below is an English-language profile of the composer, with a few seconds of Stockhausen in rehearsal and an interview with the almost comically uncomfortable artist (watch as he bolts from the set at the end of the piece):

Finally, German dramatist and poet Heiner Müller reads his poem "The Odor of Soap" in the following clip from the 1993 film I Was Hamlet, directed and photographed by Dominik Barbier:

Clips courtesy YouTube.

Posted at 8.55 am in /Videos

Permanent link to this story